Home   Help Search Login Register  

Author Topic: Tu-160 Blackjack  (Read 1331 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Canis

  • Guest
Tu-160 Blackjack
« on: 27 Aug 2003, 21:06:16 »
I want to create a Soviet Tu-160 Blackjack Strategic Bomber. I never made any addons for OF, so I was hoping if someone could point me in the right direction. I need a program to create the model...

swift88

  • Guest
Re:Tu-160 Blackjack
« Reply #1 on: 27 Aug 2003, 21:11:57 »
o2 and its partner
http://ofp.gamezone.cz/index.php?sekce=patches
go to oxygen........... tools o2 and o2 viewer and ure ready to create models
and

blueprints from http://www.suurland.com
and also a tutorial to get you on ure way......... from the legend himself Colonel klink.................. http://www.dc3d.co.nz/Tutorials/cheyenne.htm
« Last Edit: 27 Aug 2003, 21:21:02 by swift88 »

Homefry31464

  • Guest
Re:Tu-160 Blackjack
« Reply #2 on: 28 Aug 2003, 00:22:54 »
Bombers, or really and aircraft in general in OFP don't do to well.  And, since even low level for a strategic bomber such as the Tu-160 isn't extremely low, it would be hard to see flying over-head.  Also, the speed at which it would travel would be so great you would be lucky to see it for ten seconds.  I'm not trying to put down the idea, but this is kinda like the same discussion we had on the B-52, but it was decided that everything could be simulated in a script at a much smaller file size.  It would be good if there was a static model, or a destroyed model that you could but somewhere, kind of like the Blackhawk models.  Sorry to sound so negative, but as I stated above, it seems rather pointless.  They don't have to download the file if they don't want to.  Either way, look all around OFPEC and other places for tutes.

Sorry again to sound so negative.

Offline Grizzlie

  • Members
  • *
Re:Tu-160 Blackjack
« Reply #3 on: 29 Aug 2003, 10:36:09 »
Well.
Tu-160 isn't really bomber, it should be called missile carrier.
And with this dimensions and speed, one map is not enough....
Wait for OFP 2 - it is said there maps would be much bigger :)

Vyper

  • Guest
Re:Tu-160 Blackjack
« Reply #4 on: 29 Aug 2003, 17:43:06 »
you'd be better off with something slower...not an intercepter but like the SU-34....ground attack!

Vyper

theliberalpatriot

  • Guest
Re:Tu-160 Blackjack
« Reply #5 on: 19 Sep 2003, 03:27:58 »
I think having a Soviet strategic bomber/missile carrier would be great. But there is always the problem of speed. In a bomber like that you could cross Everon in 2 seconds! :o How about a slower bomber/missile carrier like the Tu-95 Bear? It would go much more slowly and you could make it in two versions. One with cruise missiles and one with bombs.

-theliberalpatriot ::)


sgt chunder

  • Guest
Re:Tu-160 Blackjack
« Reply #6 on: 21 Sep 2003, 02:51:39 »
Im working on a TU-22 Blinder for the IM:UC mod, its just a shame you cant have the rear turret working.
« Last Edit: 21 Sep 2003, 02:57:27 by sgt chunder »