Would please mission makers share their opinion on that one
please. Thank you! ---
The OAC project is meant to make OFP missions and campaigns
playable in ArmA. At times the missions need slight changes
as some aspects are different between OFP and ArmA technically
(script syntax changes).
Now is OK to update the mission without seeking the authors
approval, while keeping every other aspect intact (like readme,
stating the original author and credits) and stating very clearly
that the mission was only updated to work in ArmA by project OAC?
Thank you for your consideration.
---
My personal thoughts:
The need to request permission for every mission or to wait for
x weeks or months will effectively make the project non
functional and would kill it.
IMHO the original author's main interest was to share his work
and let others enjoy it. So as long as the true ownership and
the role of project OAC is stated I would say no permission is
needed and most authors should welcome to see their work
also playable in Armed Assault.
The exception is of course if the author explicitly stated that he
wants no modification of his work what so ever. Not to sure
on this one too though.
.kju
PS:
More details on project OAC
BIKIBI forum thread