Home   Help Search Login Register  

Author Topic: Stoner?  (Read 2290 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DBR_ONIX

  • Guest
Re:Stoner?
« Reply #15 on: 19 Jun 2004, 13:40:36 »
Theres also an M14 in the INQ Weapon pack..
Can't remeber, but I think it has a reddot scope :(

Hmm, Isn't the M14 what the M21 was based on?
- Ben

Dubieman

  • Guest
Re:Stoner?
« Reply #16 on: 19 Jun 2004, 16:18:13 »
Maybe I should find out what real M14 looks like before judging it.

I'll have to look at the search bigdog, thanks.

I always thought the M14 looked similiar to an XM or something....
« Last Edit: 19 Jun 2004, 16:18:47 by GuiltyRoachKilla »

bigdog632

  • Guest
Re:Stoner?
« Reply #17 on: 20 Jun 2004, 02:01:25 »
the M21 is a good basis on what the M14 looks like

the M1A is also a semi auto verison of the M14

Pvt Pyle in full metal jacket blew his head off with an M14

i love the rifle its heavy and accurate and isnt made of plastic

krise madsen

  • Guest
Re:Stoner?
« Reply #18 on: 14 Jul 2004, 16:15:25 »
I don't know about the OFP version, but the real M14 was originally both semi- and full auto. However, the full auto function was deleted, because the heavy recoil made it so inaccurate. The M1A is a post-war commercial version, semiauto only.

BTW, the M14A1 was a light machinegun version. It was essentially a full auto M14 with a heavier barrel, bipod and pistol grip.

bigdog632

  • Guest
Re:Stoner?
« Reply #19 on: 15 Jul 2004, 03:22:40 »
i believe at least the seb nam M14 is selective fire relatively low fire rate however